Conservatives Blame Media and Democrats for Charlie Kirk’s Death

UTHA – The killing of Charlie Kirk, a well-known conservative activist and the founder of Turning Point USA, on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, sent shockwaves through the country.

Kirk was a divisive figure with a strong public profile and close ties to President Donald Trump. He was shot and killed during a campus event, an incident that has deepened political bitterness across America.

Conservatives have blamed left-wing media and Democrats for what they describe as a culture of hostility, saying it created the conditions for Kirk’s murder.

At 31, Charlie Kirk was speaking to a college crowd outside when a single shot struck him, ending his life and sending news across the country. The gunman, named by Utah Governor Spencer Cox as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, left spent bullet casings with anti-fascist slogans such as “Hey, fascist! Catch!”

Authorities are still investigating his motive, but conservatives were quick to claim the shooting fits a larger pattern of left-driven hostility. In a video message from the Oval Office, President Trump blamed the “radical left” for comparing people like Kirk to “Nazis and the world’s worst murderers and criminals,” saying such talk leads directly to what he called terrorism.

Other right-leaning voices echoed Trump. Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) spoke angrily in Congress, saying Democrats had “f**king caused this” by branding conservatives as fascists.

Conservative figures like Laura Loomer and Christopher Rufo called for strong action against leftist groups, with Rufo demanding the authorities “infiltrate, disrupt, arrest, and incarcerate” those he held responsible.

Elon Musk, the owner of X and a former Trump official, declared that the left had become “the party of murder.” All these responses reflect a firm belief among conservatives that left-wing rhetoric now pushes people towards violence against conservatives.

Labels Used Against Kirk

Throughout his career, Charlie Kirk often found himself under fire. As the force behind Turning Point USA, he encouraged young conservatives to challenge mainstream views, especially on topics such as immigration, gender, and race. His blunt style made him a target for criticism, and left-wing media and political voices often used strong language against him.

He was called a racist for disagreeing with affirmative action and open immigration, a homophobe for opposing some LGBTQ+ issues, and even a Nazi or fascist for supporting the MAGA movement. Conservatives argue these weren’t just arguments but repeated attempts to cast Kirk as a threat.

On news outlets like MS Now, formerly MSNBC and on platforms such as Bluesky, his comments were often called hate speech. Hasan Piker, a leftist Twitch streamer with close to three million followers, suggested that Kirk’s own rhetoric led to his death, saying he had “played a part in a media world that normalises death and destruction.”

Some social media posts celebrated Kirk’s death, even if from small accounts. These celebrations only angered conservatives more, with some compiling lists of people who posted approving comments as a way to track and expose them.

Democratic Politicians and Heated Talk

Many conservatives have drawn attention to Democratic politicians, blaming them for raising the temperature of public debate. Leaders such as Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) have all called Republicans “Nazis” or “fascists.”

Conservatives claim these terms don’t just criticize but incite by drawing a clear, threatening line between Americans and some of the most hated figures in modern history.

Jasmine Crockett, for example, stood by her use of “Wannabe Hitler” for Trump during a radio appearance shortly after Kirk’s death. She denied any connection between the phrase and the violence, turning the criticism on Trump instead. Conservatives like commentator Alexander Hall still saw her comments as dangerous, suggesting she was excusing or rationalizing violence.

Senator Cory Booker, even as he condemned the shooting, had previously described Trump’s White House as a danger to democracy. And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez described the MAGA movement as a serious risk to American values.

Chuck Schumer has come under fire for past statements that some see as intimidating. In 2020, he warned Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh that they would “pay the price” for certain rulings, a phrase conservatives now point to as crossing a line.

While Schumer called for calm after Kirk’s death, critics like Representative Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) dismissed these messages, saying it was already too late to put things right.

Republicans argue these examples point to a pattern of Democrats using sharp language to paint conservatives as enemies rather than opponents. The Republican National Committee pointed out similarities between the language used by the shooter and everyday Democratic talking points.

Growth of Hostile Rhetoric Online

Social media now spreads heated rhetoric faster than ever. According to conservatives, left-leaning voices have grown especially bold online, with platforms like X, Bluesky, and Twitch turning into battlegrounds. At times, users rally support or mock opposing figures openly after tragedies.

One viral clip, posted by commentator Paul A. Szpula, shows a woman laughing about Kirk’s death while wearing a T-shirt with an insult aimed at Trump, and referencing Kirk’s earlier claim that some gun deaths might be “prudent” to protect the Second Amendment.

These moments, while not common across all users, are cited by conservatives as proof of a culture of hostility.

Alex Goldenberg from the Nonpartisan Center for Research and Intelligence (NCRI) said such online reactions fit with research showing a growing taste for political violence on the left. While top Democrats such as Barack Obama and Joe Biden have condemned Kirk’s murder and called for unity, actions and words from fringe voices online continue to fuel conservative claims of widespread left-wing aggression.

Posts calling for conflict or blaming Democrats for murder have spread fast, especially after figures like Andrew Tate and Ian Miles Cheong called Kirk’s death an act of war.

Mainstream news outlets such as CNN and MSNBC are also accused by conservatives of treating Republican figures as enemies of democracy. Terms such as “fascist” and “authoritarian” are now used openly.

Mollie Hemingway, editor-in-chief of The Federalist, called this sort of talk “assassination prep rhetoric,” saying it encourages people to see conservatives as targets. Conservatives also criticize what they see as the media’s double standards, accusing journalists of ignoring or excusing violence against Republicans while condemning right-wing language.

Political Violence in Wider Context

Charlie Kirk’s killing is just one in a growing series of violent political acts across the country. Trump himself survived two assassination attempts in 2024, and a Democratic lawmaker and her husband were murdered in Minnesota the same year.

Attacks such as the firebombing of Governor Josh Shapiro’s home and the shooting of embassy staff in Pennsylvania have made clear the danger stretches across political lines. Still, conservatives argue that the left’s rhetoric is especially dangerous, as no major Democratic figure has openly backed violence.

A 2020 report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies identified far-right extremists as the top perpetrators of domestic terrorism at the time, but since then, left-wing violence has grown. Conservatives claim that when the left compares people to Nazis, it gives some the moral permission to act. They point to the anti-fascist graffiti left at the scene of Kirk’s murder as proof.

Conservatives insist that inflammatory language from the left has spiralled out of control. They call for less extreme speech and ask Democratic politicians and media outlets to avoid terms that strip away people’s humanity, like “Nazi” or “fascist.” Utah Governor Spencer Cox offered a plea for forgiveness and avoiding revenge, warning that fuelling more hate will only cause a wider cycle of violence.

RICO Act to Investigate Groups

Some conservatives, including Christopher Rufo and Blake Masters, have suggested taking legal action under laws such as RICO to investigate groups they believe support political violence. Matt Forney went so far as to compare Kirk’s death to the Reichstag fire, arguing it justified a government crackdown on the left. These moves have made many Democrats nervous that civil liberties could be at risk.

On the other side, Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reject the charge that their language is to blame and point to examples of violence against Democrats as proof that the problem crosses party lines.

They argue that Trump’s history of provocative statements shows political violence isn’t a one-sided issue. Political violence experts such as Dalya Berkowitz from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace say leaders need to speak out clearly and fight online radicalization on all sides.

Charlie Kirk’s assassination has exposed the harsh divides in US politics. Conservatives say that the language used by left-wing media and major Democratic voices, with labels like “racist,” “homophobe,” and “Nazi,” has encouraged violence.

Rhetoric from political figures such as Jasmine Crockett, Cory Booker, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Chuck Schumer, as well as angry online posts, has convinced many conservatives that the left has gone too far.

While Democrats have condemned the attack and called for peace, many conservatives see an urgent need to rein in the language. The country now faces the challenge of finding a way back to more respectful debate, even as strong feelings on both sides remain.