(CTN News) – Epic Games prevailed in yet another significant lawsuit initiated by Google. Google’s app store and billing system were recognized as illegal monopolies in accordance with a jury finding that was upheld by the Ninth Circuit in 2023.

This action has the potential to modify the Android ecosystem and app access. In a unanimous decision, all three justices upheld the verdict in Epic Games v. Google. Google’s monopoly on Android app distribution and in-app payments is in violation of antitrust regulations in the United States, as per the court’s ruling.

Epic Games’ verdict allowed for a postponed injunction.

Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, described it as a “total victory” for X, which was previously known as Twitter. Google is obligated to modify its business procedures within fourteen days if an emergency stay is not granted.

Google is obligated to allow rival app retailers to establish Google Play Stores in accordance with the permanent order.

Play Store and Epic Games Store integration is required.

Google will be unable to mandate that app developers utilize Google Play Billing as a result of the court’s ruling. This provision has sparked a debate, as it permits Google to retain a portion of the revenue generated from in-app purchases.

Google is obligated to adhere to the injunction for a period of three years if it is upheld. This demonstrates that Android consumers are capable of effortlessly adapting to a variety of app marketplaces and charging schemes.

Judge M. Margaret McKeown referenced Fortnite at the outset of her opinion. Her comparison was to the high-stakes conflicts, which she contrasted with the sluggish, rule-based process of antitrust law. McKeown asserts that the decision “reaffirmed longstanding principles of antitrust, trial procedure, and injunctive remedies.”

In spite of the abundance of thrilling action in Fortnite. She observed similarities between Apple and Google, despite the fact that they operate independently. Despite Apple’s “walled garden,” Android is entirely accessible.

Conversely, McKeown clarified that transparency does not serve as an adequate justification for anticompetitive practices. Google intends to submit an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. As per the corporation, the ruling has the potential to “significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine innovation.”

The company’s primary concern is the security of the platform, according to Lee-Anne Mulholland, the global director of regulatory affairs for Google, despite her disagreement with the ruling.

Google has fourteen days to comply with the injunction, despite the fact that it has appealed it. Judge James Donato granted Google eight months to safeguard its users during the platform’s operational period.

It is feasible that third-party app stores will not be accessible on the Play Store until 2026, as this deadline provides the organization with an ample amount of time to implement modifications.

Epic filed its initial lawsuit against both companies in 2020.

Fortnite was removed from both the Google Play Store and the Apple App Store. Epic created a covert method of payment within the game to bypass the invoicing systems of Apple and Google, a violation of both companies’ policies.

Epic Games provided an explanation for their decision as a form of protest against monopolistic business practices. Epic was effective in its dispute with Google; however, it was unsuccessful in its dispute with Apple.

The jury examined internal communications and covert transactions in order to illustrate Google’s efforts to prevent new app retailers from competing with existing ones. This encompasses revenue-sharing agreements with mobile device manufacturers and video game publishers.

The court of appeals determined that Apple’s victory should not affect the litigation initiated by Google. The Epic Games professional domains in which Apple and Google operate are distinct, as Judge McKeown explained. She stated that McDonald’s competes with Chick-fil-A in the fast food industry but not in the hamburger market with respect to patties.

In accordance with the ruling, Google maintained a monopoly on the distribution and charging of Android applications. The tech behemoth reached a unanimous decision of conviction as a result of these discoveries. Android will endure a transformation as a consequence of this ruling if the Supreme Court does not intervene.

In the near future, developers may have greater control over the distribution of applications and payments. Users may also capitalize on increased competition and reduced prices.

Epic Games is in the process of creating an app store for the Android platform. Sweeney has announced that the Epic Games Store will be accessible on Google Play subsequent to the court’s ruling.

This action demonstrates the potential of a single company’s ambitious legal approach to alter the future of mobile software and compel Google to adhere to new regulations.

SOURCE: DN